#121
|
||||
|
||||
Whate a pity
|
#122
|
||||
|
||||
3000/11000
|
#123
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#124
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
|
#125
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#126
|
||||
|
||||
So no one has sad anything about the Coral. Decent?
__________________
Stand back, I have political powers! |
#127
|
||||
|
||||
Thought they were very good. Dreaming of you is a tune!
|
#128
|
|||
|
|||
I only knew three songs, but yeah, they were good. Got the audience to remind them of the lyrics a couple of times, but I quite enjoyed them.
|
#129
|
||||
|
||||
They were great! Really enjoyed them and took me back to my uni days
|
#130
|
||||
|
||||
Maybe they're finishing earlier so people can comfortably meet last trains.
__________________
IS IT MANICS O'CLOCK YET?
|
#131
|
|||
|
|||
10.30 finish is pretty normal for arena gigs.
|
#132
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Like I say, don’t recall ever going to a gig with an 11pm curfew and it being done by 10:20 and that’s what makes it unusual for me. I’ve seen acts with similar or even shorter back catalogues put on much longer sets. Course I’ve seen it other way around too. Yeah maybe it is unrealistic to expect 28-30 songs a night for £50, The Coral are probably charging £15-20 just for them? I do try to be realistic though, I’m not expecting em to pump out another Holy Bible or Everything Must Go, but equally I’m never going to rule it out. Oh they’re in different circumstances, they’ve got different priorities, they can never be capable of hitting their peaks again. I don’t buy that ageist shit, we know what they’re capable of. I don’t think it’s possible to piss on a legacy, I don’t think shit albums ruin good albums. I’m not one of these who expects their whims catered for and I’m a hell of a lot more forgiving than most of the critical people who’ve posted on here over the years! But I know the sun doesn’t shine out of their arses either, even my favourite band of all time, that I dread to imagine how much I’ve spent on, can’t be perfect. Yeah they’ve chucked a couple of surprises in the set list, but when you’ve got a back catalogue the size of theirs to choose from and so many songs that still haven’t seen the light of day for ages or ever, surely it’d be harder not to! I’m quite underwhelmed by Resistance Is Futile too though, but somehow I just knew what highlights I do have wouldn’t be getting played. I dunno, I just feel like my faith is being tested!
__________________
|
#133
|
||||
|
||||
I still think you just always find something to moan about. If they came on at 8.45 (instead of 9.15) and played till 10.20 then you got as much as they have always done as long as i've been following. So if you expect more, than that's on you. You should also know that a curfew time is pretty meaningless except as the latest it can go. People have also said it's normal for arena gigs? and also it does let people get home.
As for ticket prices or setlist choices, that's a different thing. But again, after 20 years, this is how they do setlists so it seems odd to be that disappointed. But that has nothing to do with whether they finished at 10.45 like normal or 10.20. |
#134
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
But (and it's a pretty massive but) there haven't been signs of that on any MSP tour pretty much ever with the honorable exception of PPF. I'm sure you've been to enough shows by different bands to get that feeling you get, when you work out their setlist formula. They all have them. If, for example, you went to see Muse in the early days - you'd know that they had a reputation for playing 2 completely different shows on 2 consecutive nights. If you saw them do 2 identical shows around that time - I'd say you could be rightly cheesed off. Eventually (and perhaps inevitably,) they started to do the same show every time once they hit the arenas. That was pretty frustrating for a lot of fans. But you have to ask yourself the question whether that's something you can live with, or even enjoy, or not. I get your frustration, but I'd also wager that anyone on this forum knows the drill when it comes to an MSP set. True. But bear in mind that the nature of the songs is a big part of set length. Go to a hardcore/metal show and you're getting 45 minutes, or an hour at the most regardless of how many songs the band has. Now, the Manics are not a metal band. But James sings in a high range and with as close to a metal bark as you're likely to see outside of that genre. As the years have gone on, I'd imagine that it's a big ask for him to do a 90 minute show, and I also suspect that's why this particular tour mostly has a night on followed by a night off.
__________________
“I have known many sorrows, most of which never happened.” Mark Twain Last edited by darkanddivine; 28-04-2018 at 15:09. |
#135
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Alright, if we're stood in a courtroom you can say curfew is meaningless besides it being the latest an act can perform till, but honestly the vast majority of gigs I've ever been to have ran till generally 15-20 minutes before curfew, whatever time that is. If you think that's meaningless and not indicative of anything people could reasonably expect from a curfew, that's on you. Quote:
Quote:
I did wonder about the spacings on the early bit of the tour whether they were anticipating demand for extra dates or whether that's all scheduling would allow for the places they want to go, or whether they were wanting the breaks. Two nights off between Manchester and Llandudno, hard not to get curious about the room that'll allow to brush up on rehearsals..
__________________
|
|
|